If ‘free money’ broke housing before, a 50-year mortgage will finish the job

Didier Malagies • November 17, 2025

This is a subtitle for your new post


Slip out the back, Jack!
Make a new plan, Stan.
You don’t need to be coy, Roy.
Just get yourself free.


As Paul Simon sang in the song “50 Ways to Leave Your Lover,” just change the word “Lover” to “50-Year Mortgage,” and you have some really good advice. Being free of too much debt is key.

The 50-year mortgage, in my opinion, is a gimmick that, if put into place, would hurt the consumer and possibly the economy on a long-term basis.


The danger, of course, is that when debt feels cheap and the horizon looks endless, people convince themselves the rules don’t apply to them. I watched that mindset take hold once before.


In 2005, we went out to dinner with my wife’s hairdresser and her handyman husband. In the car, he told us that he purchased four homes to flip. I later went to list a home at a ritzy country club. The sellers were upset with the number I gave them on two estate homes they recently closed on. The couple wanted a $300,000 profit on a million-dollar purchase. After all, their friends made $150,000 on a home they flipped, and they were surely smarter than them.


Yet another one never looked up from her papers while looking at an investment condo. When I told her there is a commission and title costs on the flip side, let alone carrying costs if it didn’t sell right away, I got scolded. She had just graduated from a real estate university, and if I wouldn’t help her, she would find someone who would. I passed on that one.


Free money is tempting

Fast-forward, and 2006–2014 was more of a real estate depression than a Great Recession in South Florida. Having survived through the Big Short market, I saw firsthand how consumers, if given the chance at free money, will take it — even to their own detriment. That market, and the free money with it, caused ghastly harm to the economy. I had hundreds of people doing short sales with the fantasy of getting free from their ball-and-chain house and into a rental.


Dodd-Frank corrected much of that. People will choose to save a few hundred dollars and buy into a 50-year mortgage. Many of them are the same people who will take on a college education with hundreds of thousands in debt. Fifty-year mortgages will let people take risks to get into housing when they shouldn’t.

The good news is that inventory is starting to taper down and, in some cases, reverse the other way. Plus, 6% mortgage rates have been the sweet spot where the buyer can afford a home or move on from their precious 3% to 4% rate.” Furthermore, home prices are not going up with inflation. Home purchases have been the outlier of the economy since everything from auto parts to food to clothing has gone up in double digits. Put another way, resale homes are depreciating in real time.


The one caveat regarding 6% mortgage rates being the magic number where the consumer pulls the trigger is the cost to the consumer on other items affected by inflation. Does 6% become too pricey because other costs are eating into that affordability model? Five percent might have to be the new 6% tipping point.

The Fed, dealing with inflation, might not be able to lower rates further, because they need tools to combat inflation. Thus, the need for the 50-year mortgage gimmick.



If you see it, hop off the bus, Gus — and make sure to keep yourself free.

Jeff Lichtenstein is the CEO & Broker of Echo Fine Properties – Palm Beach Gardens.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of HousingWire’s editorial department and its owners.


Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies December 26, 2025
When someone has lived in a home for many years, their property taxes are often artificially low because of long-standing exemptions and assessment caps (like Florida’s Save Our Homes). If you close in January of the following year, here’s what happens: What you get at closing Property taxes are paid in arrears At a January closing, the tax proration is based on the prior year’s tax bill That bill still reflects: The long-term owner’s capped assessment Their homestead exemption As the buyer, you effectively benefit from those lower taxes for that entire year Why the increase doesn’t hit right away The county does not immediately reassess at closing The new assessed value is set as of January 1 of the year after the sale The higher tax bill is issued the following year Timeline example January 2026 – You close on the home All of 2026 – Taxes are based on the prior owner’s low, capped value November 2026 – You receive the first tax bill, still using the old assessment January 2027 – Reassessment takes effect at the higher value November 2027 – You receive the higher tax bill Key takeaway You enjoy the lower taxes for the full year after closing The adjustment does not occur until the second year This is why January closings after a long-term owner can look very attractive up front—but the increase is delayed, not eliminated Why this matters Many buyers think the taxes shown at closing are permanent. In reality, they’re just on a one-year lag due to how property tax assessments work. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies December 17, 2025
Here’s what’s really happening and why consumers are confused: Why “low rates & no closing costs” isn’t true Rates aren’t actually low Headline ads often quote temporary buydowns, ARM teaser rates, or perfect-credit scenarios that very few borrowers qualify for. The real, fully indexed 30-year fixed rate is meaningfully higher once you look at actual pricing. “No closing costs” usually means one of three things Lender credits: The borrower pays through a higher interest rate. Seller concessions: Only possible if the seller agrees — not universal. Costs rolled into the loan: Still paid, just financed over time. Rate buydowns are being marketed as permanent 2-1 or 1-0 buydowns lower payments only for the first year or two. Many borrowers don’t realize their payment will increase later. AI-driven and online lenders amplify the issue Automated platforms advertise best-case pricing without explaining: LLPAs DTI adjustments Credit overlays Property type impacts What customers should be told instead (plain truth) There is always a trade-off between rate and costs. If closing costs are “covered,” the rate will be higher. If the rate is lower, the borrower is paying for it upfront. There is no free money — just different ways to pay. How professionals are reframing the conversation Showing side-by-side scenarios: Low rate / higher costs Higher rate / lender credit Focusing on total cost over time, not just the rate Explaining break-even points clearly Given your background in mortgages and rate behavior, this kind of misrepresentation usually shows up late in the process, when the borrower sees the LE and feels misled. If you want, I can help you: tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies December 11, 2025
If the **Federal Reserve cuts interest rates by 0.25% and simultaneously restarts a form of quantitative easing (QE) by buying about $40 billion per month of securities, the overall monetary policy stance becomes very accommodative. Here’s what that generally means for interest rates and the broader economy: 📉 1. Short-Term Interest Rates The Fed’s benchmark rate (federal funds rate) directly sets the cost of overnight borrowing between banks. A 0.25% cut lowers that rate, which usually leads to lower short-term borrowing costs throughout the economy — for example on credit cards, variable-rate loans, and some business financing. Yahoo Finance +1 In most markets, short-term yields fall first, because they track the federal funds rate most closely. Reuters 📉 2. Long-Term Interest Rates Purchasing bonds (QE) puts downward pressure on long-term yields. When the Fed buys large amounts of Treasury bills or bonds, it increases demand for them, pushing prices up and yields down. SIEPR This tends to lower mortgage rates, corporate borrowing costs, and yields on long-dated government bonds, though not always as quickly or as much as short-term rates. Bankrate 🤝 3. Combined Effect Rate cuts + QE = dual easing. Rate cuts reduce the cost of short-term credit, and QE often helps bring down long-term rates too. Together, they usually flatten the yield curve (short and long rates both lower). SIEPR Lower rates overall tend to stimulate spending by households and investment by businesses because borrowing is cheaper. Cleveland Federal Reserve 💡 4. Market and Economic Responses Financial markets often interpret such easing as a cue that the Fed wants to support the economy. Stocks may rise and bond yields may fall. Reuters However, if inflation is already above target (as it has been), this accommodative stance could keep long-term inflation elevated or slow the pace of inflation decline. That’s one reason why Fed policymakers are sometimes divided over aggressive easing. Reuters 🔁 5. What This Doesn’t Mean The Fed buying $40 billion in bills right now may technically be labeled something like “reserve management purchases,” and some market analysts argue this may not be classic QE. But whether it’s traditional QE or not, the effect on liquidity and longer-term rates is similar: more Fed demand for government paper equals lower yields. Reuters In simple terms: ✅ Short-term rates will be lower because of the rate cut. ✅ Long-term rates are likely to decline too if the asset purchases are sustained. ➡️ Overall borrowing costs fall across the economy, boosting credit, investment, and spending. ⚠️ But this also risks higher inflation if demand strengthens too much while supply remains constrained. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
Show More