Research suggests older mortgage borrowers may be paying more for loans

Didier Malagies • March 20, 2023


There exists a link between the age of a mortgage borrower and the interest rate they are paying in their loan, and while age-based discrimination could be a factor, not enough information could make such a determination.


However, there is a possibility that a lack of comparison shopping could result in older mortgage borrowers paying more for their loans. This is according to a new research brief published by the Boston College Center for Retirement Research (CRR).


Following up on previous research that suggested a link between borrowers’ age and application rejection rates, the latest research from CRR aimed to determine if older borrowers actually end up paying more for mortgage financing.


“In today’s aging society, it is important to understand whether aging affects an individual’s access to credit,” the brief said. “The first brief in this series concluded that older mortgage applicants were more likely to be turned down for a loan than their younger counterparts – and this effect was both statistically significant and large. One plausible reason for this relationship is that lenders could be taking into account the costly effects of age-related mortality risk when making loan decisions.”


When aiming to examine whether interest rates charged on home loans varied based on a borrower’s age, it did find a link but the effect was far more modest than the one observed in the previous brief.


“Specifically, for home purchase mortgages, older loan recipients paid an additional 8 basis points, compared to a base cost of 391 basis points,” the brief explained. “This difference in rates by age could potentially be explained by consumer behavior; for example, older borrowers may do less comparison shopping for the best rate.”


There are costs — physical, mental and financial — that are associated with comparison shopping, which might indicate why older borrowers are less likely to engage in it, the brief said.


“Since search can be costly, it is plausible that, due to a higher likelihood of physical or mental fatigue and technology aversion, older borrowers perform a less comprehensive search of potential lenders than younger borrowers,” the brief said. “Therefore, older borrowers end up receiving less favorable coupon rates because they cannot provide competing rates for lenders to match.”


There could also be age discrimination at play, but the data was not strong enough to either rule in or rule out such discrimination as a cause for the observed rate discrepancy, the brief said.



Women were also “consistently” more likely to pay more than their male counterparts, the research said, but more specific work would need to be undertaken to determine the cause for this trend, according to the brief.



Have A Question?

Use the form below and we will give your our expert answers!

Reverse Mortgage Ask A Question


Start Your Loan with DDA today
Your local Mortgage Broker

Mortgage Broker Largo
See our Reviews

Looking for more details? Listen to our extended podcast! 

Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies August 25, 2025
Great question. Markets don’t usually wait until the Fed actually cuts rates to react — they move in advance, based on expectations. Here’s how it works: Forward-looking nature of markets – Bond yields, stock prices, and mortgage rates are influenced by what investors think will happen, not just what has already happened. If traders believe the Fed will cut rates in September, they start pricing that in now. Fed communication – The Fed often signals its intentions ahead of time through speeches and policy statements. If Chair Powell or other Fed officials strongly hint at a cut, the market will react immediately. Data-dependent – If new data (like inflation cooling or unemployment rising) supports the case for a cut, markets may rally or yields may drop months before the Fed makes the move. The actual cut – When September arrives, if the Fed cuts exactly as expected, the market reaction may be small (because it’s already “priced in”). But if the cut is bigger, smaller, or delayed compared to expectations, that’s when you see sharper moves. 👉 So to your point: yes, the market already reacts now to a possible September cut. By the time the Fed announces it, most of the impact could be baked in.  tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies August 18, 2025
Here’s a clearer breakdown of what lies ahead for Social Security as it turns 90: 1. Trust Fund Depletion: A Real and Growing Threat 2025 Trustees Report projects that the OASI (Old-Age & Survivors Insurance) Trust Fund will be depleted by 2033 . At that time, beneficiaries would receive only about 77% of scheduled benefits. Social Security Peterson Foundation The Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund is expected to remain solvent through at least 2099. Social Security Peterson Foundation If OASI and DI were merged hypothetically, the combined OASDI reserves would be exhausted around 2034 , with roughly 81% of benefits payable at that time. Social Security AARP Other sources echo this timeline: some forecasts suggest insolvency might arrive as early as 2033 or 2034 , with 20–26% cuts unless reforms are enacted. The Week+1 TIME+1 The Sun Kiplinger investopedia.com 2. Contributing Factors to the Crisis Demographics : The worker-to-beneficiary ratio has plummeted—from 16.5 per retiree in 1950 to around 2.7 today—coping with an aging population and declining birth rates. The Sun investopedia.com Peterson Foundation Wikipedia Policy Changes : Recent laws like the Social Security Fairness Act (2025) that restored withheld benefits for certain groups raised payouts without funding offsets, accelerating depletion. AARP investopedia.com Reduced Agency Resources : The SSA saw significant staffing reductions—estimates suggest about 20% of field staff were let go —compromising service delivery. investopedia.com HousingWire 3. What Happens After Depletion? Benefits won't vanish—but if no corrective action is taken, they would be automatically reduced to the level sustainable by ongoing payroll tax revenue—approximately 77–81% of the current scheduled amounts. investopedia.com TIME AARP Peterson Foundation That represents a 19–23% cut in benefits. For instance, a retiree currently receiving $2,000/month would see payments drop to around $1,545–$1,600/month . investopedia.com TIME The Week 4. Solutions & Proposals to Preserve the Program Here are some of the leading ideas under consideration: a. Raising Revenue Payroll Tax Increase Tax hikes—from 12.4% toward 16% —could close funding gaps, though they carry economic trade-offs. The Sun The Week Wikipedia Bipartisan Policy Center Tax Higher Incomes or Remove the Earnings Cap Increasing or eliminating the taxable earnings ceiling, or taxing benefits/investment income, could improve funding. AARP Wikipedia Bipartisan Policy Center Kiplinger b. Reducing or Restructuring Benefits Reduce Benefits for New Recipients A modest 5% cut starting in 2025 could extend solvency only a few more years. AARP Means-Testing or Adjust COLA Lowering cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) or reducing benefits for wealthier retirees could help but are unpopular. AARP Raise Retirement Age Gradually Incremental increases to the full retirement age could yield sizable savings. AARP c. Structural Reforms & Investment Strategies Bipartisan Investment Fund (Cassidy–Kaine Plan) This proposal would inject $1.5 trillion into a separate fund that invests in stocks and bonds, aiming to generate growth over 75 years and preserve all benefits without resorting to general government borrowing. The Washington Post investopedia.com Brookings Blueprint Advocates a system that maintains core principles, ensures universal participation, and restores long-term solvency without expanding general fund use. Brookings 5. The Road Ahead: What’s Likely to Happen? Inaction isn’t an option—delaying reform would escalate the scale of necessary changes. Peterson Foundation The Week Kiplinger Politically, topics like benefit cuts, tax hikes, and raising the retirement age remain extremely sensitive. Successful reform will likely involve a mix of revenue increases, eligibility tweaks, and investment innovations , crafted in a way that spreads burden fairly and maintains public support. Some bipartisan pathways—like the Cassidy–Kaine plan—offer creative long-term strategies, but most require immediate bridging solutions (e.g., modest tax increases or cost adjustments) to prevent cuts in the next decade. Didier Malagies nmls212566 DDA Mortgage nmls324329 
By Didier Malagies August 18, 2025
yes — shopping for your homeowners' insurance annually is generally a smart move. Here’s why: 1. Rates change more than you think. Insurance companies regularly adjust premiums based on inflation, claims data, weather patterns, and even changes to your credit or risk profile. A company that was cheapest two years ago might now be in the middle of the pack. 2. Your coverage needs can shift. If you’ve renovated, added security systems, bought expensive personal items, or paid off your mortgage, you may need to adjust your coverage — and some insurers may reward those updates with lower rates. 3. Loyalty discounts can fade. While some insurers offer loyalty perks, others quietly raise rates on long-term customers (“price optimization”), counting on you not to shop around. 4. Bundling opportunities change. If you’ve switched auto or other policies, you might qualify for better bundle discounts elsewhere. Tips for shopping annually: Compare at least 3–4 quotes. Match coverage limits exactly when comparing prices — don’t just look at the premium. Check both local agents and online marketplaces. Ask about claim satisfaction and financial stability, not just price. Reassess your deductibles; a higher deductible can lower your premium. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgayge nmls#324329
Show More