Workers expect defined contributions to carry them through retirement, but anxiety remains

Didier Malagies • November 7, 2023

Defined contribution plans like 401(k)’s are seen as a critical retirement financing vehicle, but many employees feel they still won’t have enough money to last a full retirement


Workers broadly expect their defined contribution retirement plans, such as 401(k)s, to be their primary source of cash when they retire. However, many workers maintain a high level of anxiety about having enough cash to last a full retirement, according to new data from human resources company Buck.

“While many employees (79%) are satisfied with their retirement benefits, they don’t necessarily believe their savings will prove adequate and 76% have increased concerns about their capacity to save for retirement given the unstable economy,” the findings read. “More than a third (35%) of employees cited the rising cost of living expenses as the top impediment to saving, followed by personal debt (20%) and family obligations (11%).”


There is also a disconnect between the competitiveness of retirement packages offered by employers between dedicated human resources professionals and workers, with 91% of HR professionals believing their companies are competitive with such benefits while 61% of employees believe “they could find a better package with a different employer.”


“With rising inflation, it’s not surprising that employees are concerned about their ability to save for retirement and this, in turn, is reflected in the perceived value of employer-sponsored retirement plans,” said Tonya Manning, U.S. wealth practice leader and chief wealth actuary at Buck. “[Defined contribution] plans have evolved to become the primary retirement savings vehicle for Americans, and for plan sponsors, the challenge is how to help participants reach their savings goals.”


Employees also remain far more focused on their immediate financial needs as opposed to thinking ahead to retirement, as more than half (53%) of employees preferred a $500 pay increase over a $500 increase being applied to retirement plan contributions.


Workers also report that despite legislative changes to retirement plans in the U.S., many have not noticed any discernible change to their own retirement plans over the past two years. But employers do have plans in motion, according to the survey.


“[Fifty-seven percent] of employers offer, or plan to offer, matching retirement contributions for student loan payments, a provision included in the recent SECURE 2.0 legislation,” the results explained. “This would be a popular move as 57% of employees would like to see this enhancement.”



In terms of survey methodology, Buck “commissioned an independent research firm to survey benefits-eligible employees and HR and benefits professionals who administer retirement plans, allowing for a comparison of similarities and differences between employee and employer responses,” the results said.



Have A Question?

Use the form below and we will give your our expert answers!

Reverse Mortgage Ask A Question


Start Your Loan with DDA today
Your local Mortgage Broker

Mortgage Broker Largo
See our Reviews

Looking for more details? Listen to our extended podcast! 

Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies December 26, 2025
When someone has lived in a home for many years, their property taxes are often artificially low because of long-standing exemptions and assessment caps (like Florida’s Save Our Homes). If you close in January of the following year, here’s what happens: What you get at closing Property taxes are paid in arrears At a January closing, the tax proration is based on the prior year’s tax bill That bill still reflects: The long-term owner’s capped assessment Their homestead exemption As the buyer, you effectively benefit from those lower taxes for that entire year Why the increase doesn’t hit right away The county does not immediately reassess at closing The new assessed value is set as of January 1 of the year after the sale The higher tax bill is issued the following year Timeline example January 2026 – You close on the home All of 2026 – Taxes are based on the prior owner’s low, capped value November 2026 – You receive the first tax bill, still using the old assessment January 2027 – Reassessment takes effect at the higher value November 2027 – You receive the higher tax bill Key takeaway You enjoy the lower taxes for the full year after closing The adjustment does not occur until the second year This is why January closings after a long-term owner can look very attractive up front—but the increase is delayed, not eliminated Why this matters Many buyers think the taxes shown at closing are permanent. In reality, they’re just on a one-year lag due to how property tax assessments work. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies December 17, 2025
Here’s what’s really happening and why consumers are confused: Why “low rates & no closing costs” isn’t true Rates aren’t actually low Headline ads often quote temporary buydowns, ARM teaser rates, or perfect-credit scenarios that very few borrowers qualify for. The real, fully indexed 30-year fixed rate is meaningfully higher once you look at actual pricing. “No closing costs” usually means one of three things Lender credits: The borrower pays through a higher interest rate. Seller concessions: Only possible if the seller agrees — not universal. Costs rolled into the loan: Still paid, just financed over time. Rate buydowns are being marketed as permanent 2-1 or 1-0 buydowns lower payments only for the first year or two. Many borrowers don’t realize their payment will increase later. AI-driven and online lenders amplify the issue Automated platforms advertise best-case pricing without explaining: LLPAs DTI adjustments Credit overlays Property type impacts What customers should be told instead (plain truth) There is always a trade-off between rate and costs. If closing costs are “covered,” the rate will be higher. If the rate is lower, the borrower is paying for it upfront. There is no free money — just different ways to pay. How professionals are reframing the conversation Showing side-by-side scenarios: Low rate / higher costs Higher rate / lender credit Focusing on total cost over time, not just the rate Explaining break-even points clearly Given your background in mortgages and rate behavior, this kind of misrepresentation usually shows up late in the process, when the borrower sees the LE and feels misled. If you want, I can help you: tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies December 11, 2025
If the **Federal Reserve cuts interest rates by 0.25% and simultaneously restarts a form of quantitative easing (QE) by buying about $40 billion per month of securities, the overall monetary policy stance becomes very accommodative. Here’s what that generally means for interest rates and the broader economy: 📉 1. Short-Term Interest Rates The Fed’s benchmark rate (federal funds rate) directly sets the cost of overnight borrowing between banks. A 0.25% cut lowers that rate, which usually leads to lower short-term borrowing costs throughout the economy — for example on credit cards, variable-rate loans, and some business financing. Yahoo Finance +1 In most markets, short-term yields fall first, because they track the federal funds rate most closely. Reuters 📉 2. Long-Term Interest Rates Purchasing bonds (QE) puts downward pressure on long-term yields. When the Fed buys large amounts of Treasury bills or bonds, it increases demand for them, pushing prices up and yields down. SIEPR This tends to lower mortgage rates, corporate borrowing costs, and yields on long-dated government bonds, though not always as quickly or as much as short-term rates. Bankrate 🤝 3. Combined Effect Rate cuts + QE = dual easing. Rate cuts reduce the cost of short-term credit, and QE often helps bring down long-term rates too. Together, they usually flatten the yield curve (short and long rates both lower). SIEPR Lower rates overall tend to stimulate spending by households and investment by businesses because borrowing is cheaper. Cleveland Federal Reserve 💡 4. Market and Economic Responses Financial markets often interpret such easing as a cue that the Fed wants to support the economy. Stocks may rise and bond yields may fall. Reuters However, if inflation is already above target (as it has been), this accommodative stance could keep long-term inflation elevated or slow the pace of inflation decline. That’s one reason why Fed policymakers are sometimes divided over aggressive easing. Reuters 🔁 5. What This Doesn’t Mean The Fed buying $40 billion in bills right now may technically be labeled something like “reserve management purchases,” and some market analysts argue this may not be classic QE. But whether it’s traditional QE or not, the effect on liquidity and longer-term rates is similar: more Fed demand for government paper equals lower yields. Reuters In simple terms: ✅ Short-term rates will be lower because of the rate cut. ✅ Long-term rates are likely to decline too if the asset purchases are sustained. ➡️ Overall borrowing costs fall across the economy, boosting credit, investment, and spending. ⚠️ But this also risks higher inflation if demand strengthens too much while supply remains constrained. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
Show More