President Obama's Mortgage Refinance Plan
DDA Mortgage • November 2, 2011
Mortgage refi plan targets hard-hit borrowers
By Steve Goldstein, MarketWatch
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — President Barack Obama on Monday unveiled a changed mortgage refinance plan that would allow homeowners who have suffered steep price declines on their properties to get cheaper loans.
The Home Affordable Refinance Program, the only program specifically designed for owners whose mortgages are worth more than the value of their homes, is being changed so that more Fannie Mae- or Freddie Mac-guaranteed mortgages could be refinanced. Use external link to see if Fannie Mae has guaranteed your mortgage. Use external link to see if Freddie Mac has guaranteed your mortgage.
With house prices nationally roughly a third below their peak, there are millions of borrowers who will potentially be eligible to refinance into mortgages near record lows — the 30-year carried an interest rate of 4.11% last week — rather than the mere 894,000 borrowers who have used the program so far.
“These are important steps that will help more homeowners refinance at lower rates, save consumers money and help get folks spending again,” Obama is due to tell an audience in Las Vegas, the city with the highest foreclosure rate in the country. Nevada is the only state which cumulatively is underwater on mortgages.
The new plan does have its limitations: it will require homeowners to be current on their payments and it’s only for loans sold to Fannie or Freddie by May 31, 2009. And of course, not all loans are backed by the housing giants, though state attorneys-general are separately negotiating a settlement with the nation’s top lenders that may include an element of mortgage modification.
“Given the magnitude of the housing bubble, and the huge inventory of unsold homes in places like Nevada, it will take time to solve these challenges,” Obama admitted, according to prepared remarks.
ECONOMY AND POLITICS | Economy and Politics page
The Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, estimates that refinancing could double under the program. Even so, the program would go only a small way in addressing the roughly 11 million homeowners who are underwater.
To spark interest in HARP, the program will lower fees, eliminate the current 125% loan-to-value ceiling, waive lender warranties and eliminate the need for property appraisals.
White House officials say the refinancing could save owners about $2,500 each year.
Gene Sperling, the director of the National Economic Council, said the key element of the plan is the removal of reps and warranties. “Removing reps and warranties has the potential to unleash competition for housing refinance,” Sperling told reporters on a call.
The industry embraced the initiative.
“Lenders are particularly gratified that the refinements will provide relief from some representations and warranties that lenders face when originating new loans,” said David Stevens, president and chief executive of the Mortgage Bankers Association. “These changes alone should encourage lenders to more actively participate in HARP.”
He cautioned that “it will take a bit of additional time” even after FHFA guidelines are introduced in November to implement them.
Politically, the plan is the start of a once-a-week effort to show the Obama administration can get things done even when legislative efforts are blocked in Congress, according to the New York Times.
For the economy as a whole, the program is seen having only a limited impact.
Yelena Shulyatyeva, an economist at BNP Paribas, calculates that the program could leave to savings on the order of $2.75 billion — or 0.02% of annual disposable income.
“While the households that benefit will see an increase in disposable income of as much as 5% as a result of lower mortgage payments, in the aggregate, the direct impact is not material from a macroeconomic point of view,” she said in a note to clients.
“This would hold even if the program is more successful than the FHFA anticipates. Nevertheless, indirect benefits of the plan include further lowering delinquency rates and alleviating bank losses to a modest degree.”
Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

What Does “No Credit Score Mortgage” Mean (for FNMA) Policy Change As of November 15, 2025, Fannie Mae’s automated underwriting system (Desktop Underwriter, or DU) will no longer require a minimum third-party credit score. Fannie Mae Instead of relying on a fixed cutoff (like “you must have a 620 FICO”), DU will use Fannie Mae’s proprietary risk-assessment model to evaluate credit risk. Fannie Mae That model considers more than just credit score: payment history, “trended” credit data, nontraditional credit sources like rent, utilities, and so on. Fannie Mae Nontraditional Credit Allowed Fannie Mae’s Selling Guide includes rules for “nontraditional credit” — that is, credit history documented without a standard credit score. Selling Guide When a borrower truly has no credit score, lenders must document nontraditional credit history. For example, they might look at 12 months of cash flow or payment history (rent, utilities, insurance, etc.). Fannie requires borrowers without any credit score to complete homeownership education before closing. Selling Guide Why This Could Be a Good Thing Greater Access to Homeownership This change will likely help people who are “credit invisible” (i.e., they don’t have a traditional credit score) get conventional mortgages. Historically underserved groups (such as those who rent, use nontraditional credit, or have limited credit history) could benefit. More Holistic Underwriting By removing the rigid score minimum, DU can look at the whole financial picture. This means more weight on things like debt-to-income ratio, reserves, employment, and nontraditional credit. Using more data (rent history, payment trends) can be more predictive of whether someone will make mortgage payments than just a credit score. Potential Cost Benefits for Some Borrowers If done right, borrowers with limited credit but solid finances could qualify for a conventional loan (which may have more favorable terms than some other high-risk or subprime options). It may reduce the need for more expensive or risky loan products for people who don’t fit the “traditional” credit profile. Risks and Downsides Higher Risk for Lenders → Possibly Higher Cost Without a credit score floor, lenders are taking on more uncertainty. They may require larger down payments, lower loan-to-value ratios (LTVs), or more reserves to compensate. If the borrower is truly “credit invisible,” the lender’s verification burden is higher (to safely assess risk), which could make underwriting more stringent in non-score cases. Potential for Higher Interest Rates / Pricing Risks Even if a borrower qualifies, the interest rate may be higher compared to someone with a very good credit score, because the risk model may not “discount” as heavily without a high score. There could be loan-level price adjustments (or other risk-based pricing) tied to the riskiness of nontraditional credit profiles. Performance Uncertainty This is a newer underwriting paradigm for Fannie Mae, so long-term performance is less “battle-tested” at scale for certain nontraditional credit borrowers. If default rates go up for these loans, it could have negative implications for lenders or investors (or for how such loans are underwritten in the future). Lender Overlays Just because Fannie Mae has this policy doesn’t mean all lenders will be aggressive in offering no-score loans. Some may add their own stricter requirements (“overlays”) that make it harder than it sounds. You’ll need a lender that is comfortable underwriting nontraditional credit and willing to do the extra documentation. Is It a Good Thing For You Personally? It depends on your situation: Yes, it could be great if: You don’t have a traditional credit score but have a solid financial picture (stable income, low debt, documented payment history for rent/utilities). You want access to a mainstream, conventional mortgage. You have enough reserves/down payment to satisfy lender’s risk assessment. Be cautious if: Your income or cash flow is marginal, because the lender may not be comfortable with “no score + limited reserves.” You don’t have much documentation of nontraditional credit (you’ll need to show 12 months or more of payment history). You’re not working with a lender that understands or is experienced with Fannie Mae’s nontraditional credit program. My Verdict Overall, yes — this is a positive shift by Fannie Mae toward more inclusive, flexible underwriting. It’s likely to help more people who’ve been shut out of conventional mortgages. But it’s not “free risk”: borrowers still need to show financial responsibility, and lenders will underwrite carefully. If you are considering this type of mortgage (or someone offered it to you), I strongly recommend: Talking to a lender experienced with Fannie Mae’s nontraditional credit program. Didier Malagies nmls212566 DDA Mortgage nmls324329 .




