Blog Layout

The risk of zero-down loans while the Fed talks recession A look at the new Bank of America loan

DDA Mortgage • Sep 14, 2022


Bank of America recently announced a loan for lower-income households that doesn’t require homebuyers to come up with a downpayment or closing costs, and doesn’t base the loan on a minimum FICO score. People’s first reaction was to wonder if this was 2008 all over again. Are we really doing those types of loans and promoting homeownership again without understanding the risks?


Well, it isn’t 2008, but this type of loan does have risk — and it’s the risk that is traditional among all late economic cycle lending in America when the loan requires low or no downpayment. For sure, this Bank of America loan doesn’t have the exotic loan debt structures that caused so much pain during the housing crash years, but it’s good to understand what could happen.


First, to explain my logic here, I need to express what I believe housing is: “Housing is the cost of shelter to your capacity to own the debt. It’s not an investment.”


Part of our housing dilemma is this: How can you make something affordable when you promote it as someone’s best investment? Since many people think of housing as a wealth creator — and we want more Americans to have more wealth — then the government needs to make sure demand stays high enough for that wealth product to grow.


The entire system has to be designed to inflate the price over time. This is what we do in America. The housing market is very subsidized for demand to grow and whenever the economy gets weaker, rates fall and that impacts the housing market in a disproportionate way. 


When mortgage rates fall, the majority of homebuyers (including homeowners who need to sell to buy another home) are mostly employed, so lower rates greatly benefit them, and housing demand increases. This can lead to home prices getting out of control, especially when total inventory gets to all-time lows. That is what has happened here in the U.S. We finally paid the price — pun intended — of not having enough product, with massive home price gains from 2020-2022.


The National Association of Realtors’ total Inventory data shows that historically we have between 2 to 2.5 million homes for sale, but in 2022 we got as low as 870,000 in total inventory. I always like to add that active listings were higher in the 1980s — and we have a lot more people now. So when you add move-up buyers, move-down buyers, first-time homebuyers, cash buyers and investors together, this can get out of hand.


We can see a clear deviation in home-price growth starting in 2020, when we broke to all-time lows in inventory. So if it seems like I was panicking about 
home-price growth and desperately wanted the inventory to grow, you can see my logic. By the summer and fall of 2020, I was basically into “danger, danger, Will Robinson” mode as inventory channels broke at the worst time possible for our country.

Now, we are talking about a housing reset, and the 
Federal Reserve is hiking rates with a tone that even implies they realize they can create a job loss recession! I just want emphasize this: the Federal Reserve is actively saying households are going to feel pain and some are making statements that they might not cut rates during a recession if inflation is high.


For the traditional homeowner who bought a home many years ago and has seen their nested equity position explode higher, this isn’t much of an issue. If they lost their job, they have a lot of equity in their home, and most likely their financials have gotten better over time.


This is a plus of homeownership, a fixed long-term debt cost while their wages rise every year. As you can see below, we haven’t had the mortgage credit boom like we saw during the housing bubble years. So, not only do we have 40% plus of homes with no mortgage, the nested equity homeowners have now is almost unfair. Remember, the system is designed to keep home prices inflated.

I always stress how crucial it was to have the 2005 bankruptcy reform laws and the 2010 qualified mortgage laws, which together have allowed homeowners to have the best financial profiles in our country’s history. When we look at the credit data over the past 10 years, it looks nothing like the stress we saw from 2003-2008, which was an economic expansion and jobs being created before the job loss recession in 2008.

Homeowners buy a home, have a fixed payment, and over the life of the loan, as their wages grow, their cash flow gets better.

FICO scores look a lot better now than in the run up to the great financial crisis. So you can see the benefit of having a fixed payment shelter cost, while your wages rise. We don’t have any more 100% loans that have significant recast rate risk, so that the total payment of the home can force someone to sell, even if two people are working full time and haven’t lost their jobs. We have a much better housing ecosystem now for sure.


With that all said, the concern I have with Bank of America’s no-down loan will be the concern I always have with late-cycle lending in any economic expansion. If we are going to provide 100% financing with no closing costs and the Federal Reserve is talking about the need for a recession, then I believe we need to make sure people realize the risk of this type of loan. I have to make this statement because 
all six of my recession flags are up. 


Suppose all parties understand the risk of the Bank of America 100% loan and other low downpayment loans at the same time the Federal Reserve is trying to increase the unemployment rate. In that case, nobody can be blamed for the product — whether they are the ones offering the loan or the ones taking it.

In theory, you should never lose your home unless you lose a job or you experience a financial emergency. Your home is where you raise your family and that mortgage payment you make each month should make you sleep easy every night. 


However, no matter how sound the loan is, we can’t close our eyes to the economic cycle risk, especially when we have Federal Reserve officials talking about the need to have unemployment rates going up to help combat inflation. 




Have A Question?

Use the form below and we will give your our expert answers!

Reverse Mortgage Ask A Question


Start Your Loan with DDA today
Your local Mortgage Broker

Mortgage Broker Largo
See our Reviews

Looking for more details? Listen to our extended podcast! 

Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies 25 Mar, 2024
Home equity levels among homeowners aged 62 and older are at record levels following the end of the pandemic. As a result, reverse mortgages may no longer be considered a “loan of last resort” as financial planners aim to highlight their uses as part of a comprehensive financial plan in retirement. This is according to a column published this week by Investment News, soliciting input from planner professionals well known to the reverse mortgage business, including Wade Pfau. But other data suggests convincing borrowers of the benefits remains very challenging. Reverse mortgage use as part of a broader financial plan “is really the intention in the financial planning space,” Pfau told the outlet. While reverse mortgage customers benefit greatly from low rates, the current high-rate environment doesn’t fully cancel out their potential use as a planning tool, he explained. “It’s all about the sequence-of-returns risk in retirement planning […] Spending from the home equity helps you preserve more investments, so there is going to be a bigger legacy at the end,” Pfau told the outlet. “The beneficiaries can get more. They can pay off the loan and still have a net windfall.” This perspective is consistent with prior statements Pfau has provided to other outlets, including to RMD . Other financial planners adjacent to the reverse mortgage space offered their own thoughts, including Steve Resch, vice president of retirement strategies at Finance of America Reverse (FAR). “The goal is for the client or the family to always retain an equity position in that property. […] Years ago, that wasn’t the case,” Resch said in the story, describing the housing crisis of 2008 as a “reckoning” for the reverse mortgage industry as well as the larger housing ecosystem. Resch explained that the ballooning length of retirement in America contributes to the potential utility of a reverse mortgage for qualifying borrowers. “It’s simply a matter of demographics,” he told Investment News. “We have an enormous population that is moving into retirement. We’ve got a massive amount of equity available. We’re looking at 20- to 30-year retirements. Bringing home equity into that plan really makes sense.” Another financial planner, Gateway Wealth Management founder David Foster, cited Pfau’s work in particular as helping to bring him around on the product category as a planning tool for clients, but convincing them to take a closer look at a reverse mortgage remains a major challenge. “I think reverse mortgages might be the single most underutilized retirement planning tool,” he told the outlet. “I have found it extremely difficult to have a rational conversation with my clients about reverse mortgages. Most people who’ve paid off their house just cannot fathom the idea of going back into debt. “No amount of logic will be able to convince them that it is wise to borrow against their house in retirement after having worked so hard to pay off their home prior to retirement,” Foster added. “I’ve even had people get borderline angry with me for even suggesting the idea.” Last year, Mutual of Omaha Mortgage released survey data suggesting that education hurdles remain very steep for the reverse mortgage industry when aiming to connect with a variety of different borrowers on multiple potential use cases. 
By Didier Malagies 25 Mar, 2024
You have Conventional Mortgages, FNMA/FHMC, FHA, VA, Reverse Mortgages, Bank Statement loans, DSCR, Reverse Mortgages, and 1099 mortgages. Depending on your particular situation, could be a choice based on credit scores, income, funds to close Buying a home using Bank statements to qualify for a mortgage Buying a home using a 1099 only to qualify for a mortgage Using rental income to qualify for a mortgage Or being a first-time home buyer with just 1% down to purchase a home tune in and learn more at https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566  dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies 18 Mar, 2024
What if you refinanced your lower-rate first mortgage into a higher rate but consolidated all of your debt into one low payment. Getting rid of credit cards, car loans, installment loans, and student loans. What would your savings be a month and how much would you save? Then if property values were ever to plummet and rates came crashing down. Just go back to 2007 when we were able to refinance everyone on the HARP program. I just break things down to worse-case scenarios and how you can stay ahead of the game with your finances no matter what. I think it is time to get the house in order and save money, doesn't seem like food , medical or anything is going down but instead still going up Maybe everything we are told is not exactly correct tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog Didier Malagies nmls212566 DDA mortgage nmls#324329
Show More
Share by: