Bank failures may be the catalyst for an economic recession

Didier Malagies • March 28, 2023


Fannie Mae has projected that the recent bank failures may act as the catalyst that tips an already precarious economy into a recession — primarily due to the combination of tighter lending standards by small- and mid-sized regional banks.


The ongoing banking instability may affect the availability of jumbo mortgages and residential construction loans due to the high concentration of those originations stemming from small and mid-sized banks, Fannie Mae’s Economic and Strategic Research (ESR) Group said.


“Inflation has now been joined by financial stability concerns as threats to sustained growth,” Doug Duncan, senior vice president and chief economist at Fannie Mae, said. “These particular pre-recessionary conditions are not unusual, as bank failures often follow monetary tightening – but this may well be the catalyst for the modest recession we’ve been expecting since April 2022.”


Fannie Mae raised its first quarter GDP forecast to grow 0.9% on an annualized basis — up from its prior expectation of a 0.4 contraction. The ESR group also pushed the timing of an anticipated recession from the second quarter into the latter half of this year.


“While we do not know how long-lasting the current banking concerns will be, banks have borrowed a record amount from the Fed’s discount window over this past week, while Federal Home Loan Bank advances have also surged,” according to the ESR group. 


This is a clear sign of liquidity stress among many regional banks that may be facing deposit run pressure, Fannie Mae noted.


“We anticipate this will stabilize, but it is likely to result in greater reluctance to lend as banks seek to preserve liquidity,” it said.


The group expects the recent banking turbulence to impact single-family mortgage lending in the jumbo market, leading to fewer sales in related regions and market segments. 


Unlike conforming loans, which are largely financed through mortgage-backed securities (MBS) via capital markets, the jumbo mortgage space is almost entirely funded via the banking sector, and some regional banks are more concentrated in jumbo mortgage lending than others.


Ongoing liquidity stress could limit home financing, and therefore sales in the related market segments and geographies with high jumbo concentration, the group noted. Jumbo loans account for approximately 12% of all loans originated as of February 2022.


Construction activity may also be hampered, as construction and development loans for single-family home construction are heavily financed by regional and community banks, Fannie Mae noted. 

If some banks are selling their MBS holdings to manage liquidity, or if investors simply anticipate such behavior, this will likely add to upward pressure on the Treasury/MBS and MBS/30-year fixed-rate mortgage spreads.


But to the extent that mortgage rates do pull back, Fannie Mae said this may add some short-term support to the spring home buying season in the conforming mortgage space, as buyers currently on the sidelines may look to take advantage, as others did at the start of the year when rates fell from their peak over 7%. 

Regardless of how the banking turbulence plays out, Fannie Mae continues to expect home sales activity to remain subdued for the remainder of 2023. 


While single-family housing starts rose 1.1% in February from the revised January figure, the government-sponsored enterprise anticipates further near-term declines, even aside from any recent repercussions to construction and development loan credit tightening.


Even if mortgage rates were to pull back to 6%, affordability remains highly constrained, and most existing mortgage borrowers will continue to have rates well below current market rates. 


Even at a 6% mortgage rate, the ESR group estimated that 64% of outstanding Fannie Mae fixed-rate 30-year mortgages would have at least a 2% rate disincentive, and another 22% would have a 1% to 2% rate disincentive.


Fannie Mae downgraded its outlook for single-family purchase mortgage originations due to a downward revision to the home sales forecast. The ESR group expects purchase mortgage volumes to post around $12.4 trillion in 2023 and $1.35 trillion in 2024.

More:




Have A Question?

Use the form below and we will give your our expert answers!

Reverse Mortgage Ask A Question


Start Your Loan with DDA today
Your local Mortgage Broker

Mortgage Broker Largo
See our Reviews

Looking for more details? Listen to our extended podcast! 

Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies December 26, 2025
When someone has lived in a home for many years, their property taxes are often artificially low because of long-standing exemptions and assessment caps (like Florida’s Save Our Homes). If you close in January of the following year, here’s what happens: What you get at closing Property taxes are paid in arrears At a January closing, the tax proration is based on the prior year’s tax bill That bill still reflects: The long-term owner’s capped assessment Their homestead exemption As the buyer, you effectively benefit from those lower taxes for that entire year Why the increase doesn’t hit right away The county does not immediately reassess at closing The new assessed value is set as of January 1 of the year after the sale The higher tax bill is issued the following year Timeline example January 2026 – You close on the home All of 2026 – Taxes are based on the prior owner’s low, capped value November 2026 – You receive the first tax bill, still using the old assessment January 2027 – Reassessment takes effect at the higher value November 2027 – You receive the higher tax bill Key takeaway You enjoy the lower taxes for the full year after closing The adjustment does not occur until the second year This is why January closings after a long-term owner can look very attractive up front—but the increase is delayed, not eliminated Why this matters Many buyers think the taxes shown at closing are permanent. In reality, they’re just on a one-year lag due to how property tax assessments work. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies December 17, 2025
Here’s what’s really happening and why consumers are confused: Why “low rates & no closing costs” isn’t true Rates aren’t actually low Headline ads often quote temporary buydowns, ARM teaser rates, or perfect-credit scenarios that very few borrowers qualify for. The real, fully indexed 30-year fixed rate is meaningfully higher once you look at actual pricing. “No closing costs” usually means one of three things Lender credits: The borrower pays through a higher interest rate. Seller concessions: Only possible if the seller agrees — not universal. Costs rolled into the loan: Still paid, just financed over time. Rate buydowns are being marketed as permanent 2-1 or 1-0 buydowns lower payments only for the first year or two. Many borrowers don’t realize their payment will increase later. AI-driven and online lenders amplify the issue Automated platforms advertise best-case pricing without explaining: LLPAs DTI adjustments Credit overlays Property type impacts What customers should be told instead (plain truth) There is always a trade-off between rate and costs. If closing costs are “covered,” the rate will be higher. If the rate is lower, the borrower is paying for it upfront. There is no free money — just different ways to pay. How professionals are reframing the conversation Showing side-by-side scenarios: Low rate / higher costs Higher rate / lender credit Focusing on total cost over time, not just the rate Explaining break-even points clearly Given your background in mortgages and rate behavior, this kind of misrepresentation usually shows up late in the process, when the borrower sees the LE and feels misled. If you want, I can help you: tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies December 11, 2025
If the **Federal Reserve cuts interest rates by 0.25% and simultaneously restarts a form of quantitative easing (QE) by buying about $40 billion per month of securities, the overall monetary policy stance becomes very accommodative. Here’s what that generally means for interest rates and the broader economy: 📉 1. Short-Term Interest Rates The Fed’s benchmark rate (federal funds rate) directly sets the cost of overnight borrowing between banks. A 0.25% cut lowers that rate, which usually leads to lower short-term borrowing costs throughout the economy — for example on credit cards, variable-rate loans, and some business financing. Yahoo Finance +1 In most markets, short-term yields fall first, because they track the federal funds rate most closely. Reuters 📉 2. Long-Term Interest Rates Purchasing bonds (QE) puts downward pressure on long-term yields. When the Fed buys large amounts of Treasury bills or bonds, it increases demand for them, pushing prices up and yields down. SIEPR This tends to lower mortgage rates, corporate borrowing costs, and yields on long-dated government bonds, though not always as quickly or as much as short-term rates. Bankrate 🤝 3. Combined Effect Rate cuts + QE = dual easing. Rate cuts reduce the cost of short-term credit, and QE often helps bring down long-term rates too. Together, they usually flatten the yield curve (short and long rates both lower). SIEPR Lower rates overall tend to stimulate spending by households and investment by businesses because borrowing is cheaper. Cleveland Federal Reserve 💡 4. Market and Economic Responses Financial markets often interpret such easing as a cue that the Fed wants to support the economy. Stocks may rise and bond yields may fall. Reuters However, if inflation is already above target (as it has been), this accommodative stance could keep long-term inflation elevated or slow the pace of inflation decline. That’s one reason why Fed policymakers are sometimes divided over aggressive easing. Reuters 🔁 5. What This Doesn’t Mean The Fed buying $40 billion in bills right now may technically be labeled something like “reserve management purchases,” and some market analysts argue this may not be classic QE. But whether it’s traditional QE or not, the effect on liquidity and longer-term rates is similar: more Fed demand for government paper equals lower yields. Reuters In simple terms: ✅ Short-term rates will be lower because of the rate cut. ✅ Long-term rates are likely to decline too if the asset purchases are sustained. ➡️ Overall borrowing costs fall across the economy, boosting credit, investment, and spending. ⚠️ But this also risks higher inflation if demand strengthens too much while supply remains constrained. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
Show More