Nearly one quarter of retirement age adults are still working

Didier Malagies • June 11, 2024


A myriad of positive and negative developments in the lives of older adults — including higher living costs, inflation, longer life expectancies and higher education levels — have led to a rise in the number of retirement-aged adults remaining in the U.S. workforce according to new government data analyzed by LendingTree.


The analysis was based on U.S. Census Bureau Household Pulse Survey data, according to LendingTree.

Twenty-two percent of adults aged 65 and older are continuing to work, with nearly a quarter of the cohort choosing self-employment as their means of staving off retirement. While the overall national percentage of older adult workers has declined by a half-percent over the past two years, certain areas of the country have marked a notable increase in the figure, most especially in the state of New Jersey.


Of the 22% of older adults still working, “almost one in four (24.2%) are self-employed — nearly three times higher than among working Americans 25 to 39 (8.1%),” the results found. “Meanwhile, half (50.5%) of the older working population is employed by private companies and 10.3% by the government.”

The share of New Jersey seniors now reporting that they continue to work is sharp, rising more than 66% from the March 2022 figure to settle at 33.8% as of March 2024. Delaware and Indiana are the two states that immediately followed in the rankings, rising by 37.4% and 32.2%, respectively.


In terms of declines, the highest was observed in Iowa, dropping 36.5% from a total share of 27.1% in 2022 to 17.1% in 2024. West Virginia (34.3%) and Kansas (34.0%) saw the next biggest reductions, the data found.


The overall share of those reporting themselves as “retired” also declined, according to the findings.

“Across all Americans, the share of U.S. adults who reported being retired decreased from 16.8% in March 2022 to 16.2% in March 2024,” the results said. “Overall, the retiree percentage declined in 30 states, led by New Jersey (23.0%), North Dakota (22.9%) and Connecticut (19.9%). However, Vermont, Alaska and Maine saw the biggest increases in the percentage of retirees, at 22.6%, 13.9% and 10.7%, respectively.”

The findings are driven by the financial realities faced by the cohort according to Matt Schultz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree.



“These increases could be a concerning sign that more and more older Americans are finding themselves needing extra income in their so-called golden years,” Schultz said. “Inflation could be taking a major toll on the assumptions that these people made about what they’d need to get by in retirement.”



Have A Question?

Use the form below and we will give your our expert answers!

Reverse Mortgage Ask A Question


Start Your Loan with DDA today
Your local Mortgage Broker

Mortgage Broker Largo
See our Reviews

Looking for more details? Listen to our extended podcast! 

Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies August 25, 2025
Great question. Markets don’t usually wait until the Fed actually cuts rates to react — they move in advance, based on expectations. Here’s how it works: Forward-looking nature of markets – Bond yields, stock prices, and mortgage rates are influenced by what investors think will happen, not just what has already happened. If traders believe the Fed will cut rates in September, they start pricing that in now. Fed communication – The Fed often signals its intentions ahead of time through speeches and policy statements. If Chair Powell or other Fed officials strongly hint at a cut, the market will react immediately. Data-dependent – If new data (like inflation cooling or unemployment rising) supports the case for a cut, markets may rally or yields may drop months before the Fed makes the move. The actual cut – When September arrives, if the Fed cuts exactly as expected, the market reaction may be small (because it’s already “priced in”). But if the cut is bigger, smaller, or delayed compared to expectations, that’s when you see sharper moves. 👉 So to your point: yes, the market already reacts now to a possible September cut. By the time the Fed announces it, most of the impact could be baked in.  tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies August 18, 2025
Here’s a clearer breakdown of what lies ahead for Social Security as it turns 90: 1. Trust Fund Depletion: A Real and Growing Threat 2025 Trustees Report projects that the OASI (Old-Age & Survivors Insurance) Trust Fund will be depleted by 2033 . At that time, beneficiaries would receive only about 77% of scheduled benefits. Social Security Peterson Foundation The Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund is expected to remain solvent through at least 2099. Social Security Peterson Foundation If OASI and DI were merged hypothetically, the combined OASDI reserves would be exhausted around 2034 , with roughly 81% of benefits payable at that time. Social Security AARP Other sources echo this timeline: some forecasts suggest insolvency might arrive as early as 2033 or 2034 , with 20–26% cuts unless reforms are enacted. The Week+1 TIME+1 The Sun Kiplinger investopedia.com 2. Contributing Factors to the Crisis Demographics : The worker-to-beneficiary ratio has plummeted—from 16.5 per retiree in 1950 to around 2.7 today—coping with an aging population and declining birth rates. The Sun investopedia.com Peterson Foundation Wikipedia Policy Changes : Recent laws like the Social Security Fairness Act (2025) that restored withheld benefits for certain groups raised payouts without funding offsets, accelerating depletion. AARP investopedia.com Reduced Agency Resources : The SSA saw significant staffing reductions—estimates suggest about 20% of field staff were let go —compromising service delivery. investopedia.com HousingWire 3. What Happens After Depletion? Benefits won't vanish—but if no corrective action is taken, they would be automatically reduced to the level sustainable by ongoing payroll tax revenue—approximately 77–81% of the current scheduled amounts. investopedia.com TIME AARP Peterson Foundation That represents a 19–23% cut in benefits. For instance, a retiree currently receiving $2,000/month would see payments drop to around $1,545–$1,600/month . investopedia.com TIME The Week 4. Solutions & Proposals to Preserve the Program Here are some of the leading ideas under consideration: a. Raising Revenue Payroll Tax Increase Tax hikes—from 12.4% toward 16% —could close funding gaps, though they carry economic trade-offs. The Sun The Week Wikipedia Bipartisan Policy Center Tax Higher Incomes or Remove the Earnings Cap Increasing or eliminating the taxable earnings ceiling, or taxing benefits/investment income, could improve funding. AARP Wikipedia Bipartisan Policy Center Kiplinger b. Reducing or Restructuring Benefits Reduce Benefits for New Recipients A modest 5% cut starting in 2025 could extend solvency only a few more years. AARP Means-Testing or Adjust COLA Lowering cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) or reducing benefits for wealthier retirees could help but are unpopular. AARP Raise Retirement Age Gradually Incremental increases to the full retirement age could yield sizable savings. AARP c. Structural Reforms & Investment Strategies Bipartisan Investment Fund (Cassidy–Kaine Plan) This proposal would inject $1.5 trillion into a separate fund that invests in stocks and bonds, aiming to generate growth over 75 years and preserve all benefits without resorting to general government borrowing. The Washington Post investopedia.com Brookings Blueprint Advocates a system that maintains core principles, ensures universal participation, and restores long-term solvency without expanding general fund use. Brookings 5. The Road Ahead: What’s Likely to Happen? Inaction isn’t an option—delaying reform would escalate the scale of necessary changes. Peterson Foundation The Week Kiplinger Politically, topics like benefit cuts, tax hikes, and raising the retirement age remain extremely sensitive. Successful reform will likely involve a mix of revenue increases, eligibility tweaks, and investment innovations , crafted in a way that spreads burden fairly and maintains public support. Some bipartisan pathways—like the Cassidy–Kaine plan—offer creative long-term strategies, but most require immediate bridging solutions (e.g., modest tax increases or cost adjustments) to prevent cuts in the next decade. Didier Malagies nmls212566 DDA Mortgage nmls324329 
By Didier Malagies August 18, 2025
yes — shopping for your homeowners' insurance annually is generally a smart move. Here’s why: 1. Rates change more than you think. Insurance companies regularly adjust premiums based on inflation, claims data, weather patterns, and even changes to your credit or risk profile. A company that was cheapest two years ago might now be in the middle of the pack. 2. Your coverage needs can shift. If you’ve renovated, added security systems, bought expensive personal items, or paid off your mortgage, you may need to adjust your coverage — and some insurers may reward those updates with lower rates. 3. Loyalty discounts can fade. While some insurers offer loyalty perks, others quietly raise rates on long-term customers (“price optimization”), counting on you not to shop around. 4. Bundling opportunities change. If you’ve switched auto or other policies, you might qualify for better bundle discounts elsewhere. Tips for shopping annually: Compare at least 3–4 quotes. Match coverage limits exactly when comparing prices — don’t just look at the premium. Check both local agents and online marketplaces. Ask about claim satisfaction and financial stability, not just price. Reassess your deductibles; a higher deductible can lower your premium. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgayge nmls#324329
Show More