Older Americans are ‘splurging’ on home modifications to support aging in place

Didier Malagies • May 28, 2024


The data is clear: Older adults, when contemplating future living arrangements, would prefer to remain in their homes as long as feasibly possible. But for those who own homes with features or layouts that may not be conducive to aging in place, some are taking proactive measures — and spending a lot of money — to make their home suitable.


This is according to a story published this month by the The Associated Press, which examines steps that some older homeowners are taking to ensure they can remain in their homes, as opposed to relocating to a dedicated care facility or another living arrangement.


One profiled couple in California hired an interior designer for $20,000, and spent another $95,000 on home modifications designed to more easily accommodate natural limitations to mobility that come from aging.

“She had the kitchen aisles widened to accommodate a wheelchair in case she or her husband ever need one,” the story explained. “The bathroom now has a walk-in steam shower and an electronic toilet seat that cleans the user when activated.”


When asked about the reason for making these investments, the wife described their desire to maintain the comfort, familiarity and pride in the home they’ve lived in together rather than giving them up.

While aging in place is a common choice, economic and mortgage market realities are also making it difficult to relocate even if someone may want to. Between elevated interest rates and the resulting “lock-in” effect, home prices and limited inventory levels are also making relocations challenging for baby boomers and older members of Generation X.


“Despite feeling tied down, a subset of these older adults have enough extra cash to splurge on upgrades designed to keep their homes both enjoyable and accessible as they age,” the story said. “The demand for inconspicuous safety bars, lower sinks, residential elevators and other amenities has given home improvement chains, contractors, designers and architects a noticeable lift.”


Some of the chains reporting increased renovation and modification activity include The Home Depot and Lowe’s, two of the largest home improvement retailers in the U.S. The Home Depot is refreshing an in-house brand with accessibility in mind for things like grab bars and easier-to-use faucets. Meanwhile, in 2021, Lowe’s established a single stop for items including wheelchair ramps and shower benches, the story explained.


Customers looking for products and tools to enhance their home’s accessibility seek “bathrooms that exude beauty and elegance, with essential accessibility features seamlessly integrated,” according to Lowe’s trend and style director Monica Reese, who spoke with the AP.


The need for such renovations will only become more pressing as time goes on, due both to demographic trends and a suitability for aging in place that can be lacking in existing-home inventory.

“According to a 2023 analysis of the 2011 American Housing Survey by the Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS) of Harvard University, less than 4% of U.S. homes combine single-floor living with no-step entry, and halls and doorways wide enough for wheelchairs,” the story said.

Additionally, the Harvard study found that “20% of survey respondents age 80 and above with incomes below $30,000 reported accessibility challenges, compared to 11% for those with incomes of $75,000 or more.”


This means that renovations of existing homes are likely to become more necessary as time goes on. But there is also a need to address accessibility challenges in affordable housing for older people, which will require a public policy solution, according to Jennifer Molinsky, director of the JCHS Housing an Aging Society Program.


“[T]here’s a lot of disparity,” she said. “There are people, through no fault of their own or for systemic reasons, who may not have the money to modify.”

Reverse mortgage companies in the past have engaged in renovation partnerships, and they have advertised home modifications to facilitate aging in place as a potential use case for loan proceeds.

In a 2019 interview with RMD, Molinsky said that home equity could have a place in funding some of these necessary modifications. It could play a role in alleviating the increasing prevalence of aging-associated financial burdens for senior homeowners.



“I don’t think we know enough [yet] about where society is going, but it is true that fewer people have pensions,” Molinsky said in 2019. “So, I think there’s a good reason to think that home equity becomes an important source of money for people who don’t have those pensions or haven’t been able to save up in their 401K or IRA.”

Related



Have A Question?

Use the form below and we will give your our expert answers!

Reverse Mortgage Ask A Question


Start Your Loan with DDA today
Your local Mortgage Broker

Mortgage Broker Largo
See our Reviews

Looking for more details? Listen to our extended podcast! 

Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies August 25, 2025
Great question. Markets don’t usually wait until the Fed actually cuts rates to react — they move in advance, based on expectations. Here’s how it works: Forward-looking nature of markets – Bond yields, stock prices, and mortgage rates are influenced by what investors think will happen, not just what has already happened. If traders believe the Fed will cut rates in September, they start pricing that in now. Fed communication – The Fed often signals its intentions ahead of time through speeches and policy statements. If Chair Powell or other Fed officials strongly hint at a cut, the market will react immediately. Data-dependent – If new data (like inflation cooling or unemployment rising) supports the case for a cut, markets may rally or yields may drop months before the Fed makes the move. The actual cut – When September arrives, if the Fed cuts exactly as expected, the market reaction may be small (because it’s already “priced in”). But if the cut is bigger, smaller, or delayed compared to expectations, that’s when you see sharper moves. 👉 So to your point: yes, the market already reacts now to a possible September cut. By the time the Fed announces it, most of the impact could be baked in.  tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies August 18, 2025
Here’s a clearer breakdown of what lies ahead for Social Security as it turns 90: 1. Trust Fund Depletion: A Real and Growing Threat 2025 Trustees Report projects that the OASI (Old-Age & Survivors Insurance) Trust Fund will be depleted by 2033 . At that time, beneficiaries would receive only about 77% of scheduled benefits. Social Security Peterson Foundation The Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund is expected to remain solvent through at least 2099. Social Security Peterson Foundation If OASI and DI were merged hypothetically, the combined OASDI reserves would be exhausted around 2034 , with roughly 81% of benefits payable at that time. Social Security AARP Other sources echo this timeline: some forecasts suggest insolvency might arrive as early as 2033 or 2034 , with 20–26% cuts unless reforms are enacted. The Week+1 TIME+1 The Sun Kiplinger investopedia.com 2. Contributing Factors to the Crisis Demographics : The worker-to-beneficiary ratio has plummeted—from 16.5 per retiree in 1950 to around 2.7 today—coping with an aging population and declining birth rates. The Sun investopedia.com Peterson Foundation Wikipedia Policy Changes : Recent laws like the Social Security Fairness Act (2025) that restored withheld benefits for certain groups raised payouts without funding offsets, accelerating depletion. AARP investopedia.com Reduced Agency Resources : The SSA saw significant staffing reductions—estimates suggest about 20% of field staff were let go —compromising service delivery. investopedia.com HousingWire 3. What Happens After Depletion? Benefits won't vanish—but if no corrective action is taken, they would be automatically reduced to the level sustainable by ongoing payroll tax revenue—approximately 77–81% of the current scheduled amounts. investopedia.com TIME AARP Peterson Foundation That represents a 19–23% cut in benefits. For instance, a retiree currently receiving $2,000/month would see payments drop to around $1,545–$1,600/month . investopedia.com TIME The Week 4. Solutions & Proposals to Preserve the Program Here are some of the leading ideas under consideration: a. Raising Revenue Payroll Tax Increase Tax hikes—from 12.4% toward 16% —could close funding gaps, though they carry economic trade-offs. The Sun The Week Wikipedia Bipartisan Policy Center Tax Higher Incomes or Remove the Earnings Cap Increasing or eliminating the taxable earnings ceiling, or taxing benefits/investment income, could improve funding. AARP Wikipedia Bipartisan Policy Center Kiplinger b. Reducing or Restructuring Benefits Reduce Benefits for New Recipients A modest 5% cut starting in 2025 could extend solvency only a few more years. AARP Means-Testing or Adjust COLA Lowering cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) or reducing benefits for wealthier retirees could help but are unpopular. AARP Raise Retirement Age Gradually Incremental increases to the full retirement age could yield sizable savings. AARP c. Structural Reforms & Investment Strategies Bipartisan Investment Fund (Cassidy–Kaine Plan) This proposal would inject $1.5 trillion into a separate fund that invests in stocks and bonds, aiming to generate growth over 75 years and preserve all benefits without resorting to general government borrowing. The Washington Post investopedia.com Brookings Blueprint Advocates a system that maintains core principles, ensures universal participation, and restores long-term solvency without expanding general fund use. Brookings 5. The Road Ahead: What’s Likely to Happen? Inaction isn’t an option—delaying reform would escalate the scale of necessary changes. Peterson Foundation The Week Kiplinger Politically, topics like benefit cuts, tax hikes, and raising the retirement age remain extremely sensitive. Successful reform will likely involve a mix of revenue increases, eligibility tweaks, and investment innovations , crafted in a way that spreads burden fairly and maintains public support. Some bipartisan pathways—like the Cassidy–Kaine plan—offer creative long-term strategies, but most require immediate bridging solutions (e.g., modest tax increases or cost adjustments) to prevent cuts in the next decade. Didier Malagies nmls212566 DDA Mortgage nmls324329 
By Didier Malagies August 18, 2025
yes — shopping for your homeowners' insurance annually is generally a smart move. Here’s why: 1. Rates change more than you think. Insurance companies regularly adjust premiums based on inflation, claims data, weather patterns, and even changes to your credit or risk profile. A company that was cheapest two years ago might now be in the middle of the pack. 2. Your coverage needs can shift. If you’ve renovated, added security systems, bought expensive personal items, or paid off your mortgage, you may need to adjust your coverage — and some insurers may reward those updates with lower rates. 3. Loyalty discounts can fade. While some insurers offer loyalty perks, others quietly raise rates on long-term customers (“price optimization”), counting on you not to shop around. 4. Bundling opportunities change. If you’ve switched auto or other policies, you might qualify for better bundle discounts elsewhere. Tips for shopping annually: Compare at least 3–4 quotes. Match coverage limits exactly when comparing prices — don’t just look at the premium. Check both local agents and online marketplaces. Ask about claim satisfaction and financial stability, not just price. Reassess your deductibles; a higher deductible can lower your premium. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgayge nmls#324329
Show More