There’s more blood on the tracks in the non-QM market REIT Western Asset Mortgage Capital, coping with red ink and underwater non-QM loans, is exploring a sale or merger

DDA Mortgage • August 9, 2022


The latest non-QM player to feel the pain of the interest rate volatility afflicting the nation’s housing market this year is a Pasadena, California-based real estate investment trust called Western Asset Mortgage Capital Corp.


The REIT, which is managed by investment advisor Western Asset Management Co. LLC, recently announced that it is exploring a potential company sale or merger in the wake of posting a $22.4 million net loss for the second quarter ended June 30, — on the heels of posting a $22.2 million loss in the first quarter. WMC, with some $2.8 billion in assets, has a diverse portfolio of residential and commercial real estate assets.


A closer look at WMC’s books, however, shows that as of June 30 its residential whole loan portfolio, nearly all of which is comprised of non-QM loans, was underwater by some $44 million. That’s based on a comparison of the principal balance of the loans on the books and their fair market value as reported by the REIT as of that date.


The principal balance of WMC’s residential whole loan portfolio at June 30 stood at $1.24 billion, representing nearly half of the company’s consolidated total assets, according to WMC’s balance sheet. The REIT lists the fair value of those loans, however, at about $1.19 billion — which means the portfolio is underwater to the tune of $44 million.


In addition, more than 60% of the 3,097 non-QM mortgages by count and volume in the REIT’s whole loan portfolio — totaling 3,102 loans — bear interest rates at 5% or less. 


The dreaded discount

Because non-QM (or non-prime) mortgages are deemed riskier than prime loans, in a normal market they typically command an interest rate about 150 basis points above conforming rates, according to Thomas Yoon, president and CEO of non-QM lender Excelerate Capital. As of last week, according to Freddie Mac, the interest rate for a 30-year fixed conforming purchase mortgage stood at 4.99%, down from 5.3% a week earlier.


“The legacy non-QM coupons are like 4.5%, so we have 4.5% coupons floating around out there from earlier in the year that haven’t moved and are starting to age on warehouse lines,” said John Toohig, managing director of whole loan trading at Raymond James in Memphis. “And they have to sell them now [in the whole loan market or via securitization when we are seeing] 6%, 6.5% or 7% deals.


“It’ll be a very different buyer that comes to the rescue … and it will be at a pretty significant discount [in the whole-loan trading market]. I’m swagging it without being at my screen, but maybe in the 90s [100 is par], but certainly underwater.”


So far this year, WMC has undertaken two securitization deals through its Arroyo Mortgage Trust conduit (ARRW 2022-1 in February and ARRW 2022-2 in July). Both deals involved non-QM loans, according to bond-rating reports form S&P Global Ratings. 


Combined, the closing loan-pool balance for the two securitization deals was $834.2 million, with the weighted average interest rate for the loan pools at 4.4% for the February offering and 5.5% for the most recent deal. Keith Lind, CEO of non-QM lender Acra Lending, said rates for non-QM loans through his company were “in the high 7% [range]” for July” up from 4.5% early in the year — with Acra moving rates 18 times, mostly up, over that period.


“There’s good liquidity at that [higher] rate,” Lind added. “I don’t think investors are jumping to buy bonds backed by coupons [rates on loans] that can’t even cover the coupon on the bonds … and securitization [costs].”


In other words, lower-rate loans are at a competitive disadvantage in terms of pricing in securitization and loan-trading liquidity channels because they are worth less than the newer crop of higher-rate mortgages. Lind put it this way: “These aren’t bad loans, just bad prices.”


Non-QM mortgages include loans that cannot command a government, or “agency,” stamp through Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The pool of non-QM borrowers includes real estate investors, property flippers, foreign nationals, business owners, gig workers and the self-employed, as well as a smaller group of homebuyers facing credit challenges, such as past bankruptcies.


It’s volatile out there

WMC’s struggles with the impact of red ink in recent quarters are forcing it to consider “strategic alternatives” going forward, including a possible “sale, merger or other transaction,” CEO Bonnie Wongtrakool said in the company’s Q2 earnings announcement.

Wongtrakool added that the REIT’s recent quarterly results are reflective of “the ongoing challenges of interest rate volatility and fluctuating asset values.” She noted that WMC has made “significant progress in the last two years toward strengthening our balance sheet and improving our liquidity and the earnings power of the portfolio.” 


Still, that has not been enough for the market, and the company’s stock price. “We do not believe that these actions are being reflected in our stock price,” Wongtrakool said.


At press time, shares of WMC were trading at $15.50, compared to a 52-week high of $29.20 and a low of $11.00.The stock-value pressure is prompting the WMC to explore alternatives going forward, including a possible sale of the company.


“Today the company … announced that its board of directors has authorized a review of strategic alternatives for the company aimed at enhancing shareholder value, which may include a sale or merger of the company,” Wongtrakool said. “JMP Securities … has been retained as exclusive financial advisor to the company.


“No assurance can be given that the review being undertaken will result in a sale, merger, or other transaction involving the company, and the company has not set a timetable for completion of the review process.”


Coping with a liquidity squeeze


WMC isn’t alone in dealing with the pain sparked by volatile rates. 

Non-QM lender First Guaranty Mortgage Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection at the end of June — leaving four warehouse lenders on the hook for more than $415 million. Then, in early July, another non-QM lender, Sprout Mortgage, shuttered its doors suddenly, leaving employees out in the cold. 

Just weeks later, a text message leaked to the media revealed that Flagstar Bank is ramping up scrutiny of non-QM lenders prior to advancing warehouse funding. Flagstar will now require advance approval for funding advances. 


The bank also indicated it may adjust “haircuts” — the percentage of the loan the originator must fund itself to ensure it has skin in the game. The leaked message included a list of 16 non-QM lenders that would be affected by the changes.


Tom Piercy, managing director of Incenter Mortgage Advisors, points to yet another facet of the liquidity squeeze facing originators across the housing industry — in this case both prime and non-prime lenders. And that variable is the current compression of the yield curve as short-term interest rates rise faster than long-term rates — such as those for mortgages.


“Our short-term rates have increased substantially,” Piercy explained. “If you look at the mortgage industry right now, with this [short-term/long-term rate] inversion, it’s going to create even more heartburn because everyone’s going to be upside down on their warehouse lines [which, he said, are based on short-term rates]. 


“So, the cost of your warehouse facilities is increasing while the long side [mortgage rates] is staying low. If you originate mortgages at 5%, and you may have a cost at a warehouse line of 5.25% or 5.5%, then you’re losing money if you keep loans in the pipeline.



And, for some lenders, particularly non-QM loan originators, they also face the prospect of losing money when they seek to move loans out of their pipelines via whole-loan sales or securitizations because of the higher returns demanded by investors — who also want to stay ahead of interest-rate risks.

“It’s going to be interesting to see how this all plays out,” Piercy added.



Have A Question?

Use the form below and we will give your our expert answers!

Reverse Mortgage Ask A Question


Start Your Loan with DDA today
Your local Mortgage Broker

Mortgage Broker Largo
See our Reviews

Looking for more details? Listen to our extended podcast! 

Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies April 28, 2025
After years of identifying the housing market as unhealthy — culminating in a savagely unhealthy housing market in early 2022 — I can confidently assert that the housing market in 2024 and 2025 is on better footing. This transformation sets an extremely positive foundation for what’s to come. Some recent headlines about housing suggest that demand is crashing. However, that’s not the case, as the data below will show. Today on CNBC , I discussed this very point: what is happening now is not only in line with my price forecasts for 2024 and 2025, but it’s why I am so happy to see inventory grow and price growth data cool down. What we saw in late 2020, all of 2021 and early 2022 was not sustainable and we needed higher mortgage rates to cool things down — hence why I was team higher rates early in 2021. The last two years have ushered in a healthier market for the future of existing home sales. Existing home sales Before the existing home sales report was released Thursday, I confidently predicted a month-to-month decline, while estimating the existing home sales print to be just a tad above 4 million. That’s precisely what occurred — no surprises there, as every month in 2025 has consistently exceeded 4 million. However, it’s important to note that our weekly pending home sales data has only recently begun to show growth compared to last year. We have an advantage over the data from the National Association of Realtors since our weekly pending home sales data is updated weekly, making their report somewhat outdated. The notable surprise for me in 2025 is the year-over-year growth we observe in the data, despite elevated mortgage rates. If mortgage rates were ranging between 6%-6.64%, I wouldn’t have been surprised at all because we are working from the lowest bar in sales ever. Purchase application data If someone had said the purchase application data would show positive trends both year to date and year over year by late April, even with mortgage rates not falling significantly below 6.64%, I would have found that hard to believe. Yet, here we are witnessing consistent year-over-year growth . Even with the recent rate spike, which has clearly cooled demand week to week, we are still positive. If mortgage rates can just trend down toward 6% with duration, sales are growing. Housing inventory and price growth While my forecast for national price growth in 2024 at 2.33% was too low and in 2025 at 1.77% may be too low again, it’s encouraging to see a slowdown in price growth, which I believe is a positive sign for the future. The increase in inventory is also promising and supports long-term stability in the housing market. We can anticipate that millions of people will continue to buy homes each year, and projections suggest that we’re on track for another nearly 5 million total home sales in 2025. As wages rise and households are formed, such as through marriage and bringing in dual incomes, this influx of inventory returning to normal levels provides an optimistic outlook. This trend in inventory data is truly heartening. Conclusion With all the data lines I added above, you can see why I have a renewed optimism about the housing market. If price growth significantly outpaced inflation and wages, and inventory wasn’t increasing, I’d be discussing a much different and more concerning state of affairs. Thankfully, that’s not the case. Historically, we’ve observed that when home sales dip due to higher rates, they may remain subdued for a while but ultimately rise again. This is common during recessions, as I discussed in this recent HousingWire Daily podcast . As you can see in the existing home sales data below, we had an epic crash in sales in 2022 but found a base to work from around 4 million. This trend has shaped the landscape of housing economics since post-WWII, reminding us that resilience and recovery are always within reach. 
By Didier Malagies April 28, 2025
1. Cash-Out Refinance How it works: You replace your current mortgage with a new, larger loan and take the difference out in cash. Pros: Often lower interest rates compared to other methods. Longer repayment terms. Cons: Closing costs (typically 2–5% of the loan amount). Resets your loan term (could be 15, 20, or 30 years). Tougher underwriting for investment properties vs primary residences. 2. Home Equity Line of Credit (HELOC) How it works: You get a revolving line of credit based on your property’s equity. Pros: Flexibility — borrow what you need, when you need it. Pay interest only on what you draw. Cons: HELOCs for investment properties are harder to get and may have higher rates. Variable interest rates (payments can increase). 3. Home Equity Loan ("Second Mortgage") How it works: A lump-sum loan secured by your property's equity, separate from your existing mortgage. Pros: Fixed interest rates and predictable payments. Cons: Higher rates than primary mortgages. Separate loan payment on top of your existing mortgage. 4. Sell the Property How it works: You sell the investment property and realize your equity as cash. Pros: Immediate full access to equity. No debt obligation. Cons: Capital gains taxes may apply. You lose future appreciation and cash flow. 5. Portfolio Loan How it works: A loan based on a group (portfolio) of your properties' combined value and cash flow. Pros: Useful if you have multiple properties. Lenders may be more flexible on qualifications. Cons: Complex underwriting. Higher costs. 6. Private or Hard Money Loan How it works: Short-term, high-interest loan based on property value, not personal credit. Pros: Fast funding (days instead of weeks). Less strict underwriting. Cons: Very high interest rates (often 8%–15%+). Short loan terms (often 6–24 months). 7. Seller Financing (if you're buying another property) How it works: If you own a property free and clear, you could "sell" it and carry financing, creating cash flow and upfront cash through a down payment. Pros: Passive income from note payments. Cons: Risk if the buyer defaults. Key Factors to Think About: How quickly do you need the cash? How much do you want to borrow? How long do you want to be repaying it? How the new debt impacts your overall portfolio. tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies April 21, 2025
When you're buying a home, it's not just about affording the purchase price or down payment. You’ve got closing costs, moving expenses, and all the “surprise” things that come up after you move in — like needing a new appliance, fixing a plumbing issue, or just furnishing the place. Keeping some cash reserves is smart. A good rule of thumb is to have at least 3-6 months of living expenses saved after the purchase, just in case life throws a curveball. Are you thinking about buying soon or just planning ahead? tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
Show More